¶1Judgment reversed on the law and in the exercise of our discretion, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. We are of opinion that the amendment to the answer, sought by the defense, should have been allowed. (See Rules Civ. Prac., rule 166.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kapper, JJ., concur.
205 A.D. 894
Poltl v. Caracciolo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 15, 1923
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1923-02-15
Decided 1923-02-15