Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 Ariz. 157 - State v. Tucker

State v. Tucker’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

94
cited by 94 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 90 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 94 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2025 · most notably State v. Anderson (2005), State v. Ellison (2006)

2 federal appellate · 90 state decisions

620200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Ring v. Arizona · Von Moltke v. Gillies · Idaho v. Wright · Schad v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'any error as to the (F)(8) aggravator was harmless because we believe that no reasonable jury could have found differently than the trial judge.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The one or more homicides aggravating circumstance only applies if you find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed either: One, first degree murder; two, second-degree murder; three, manslaughter; or four, negligent homicide, and that these offenses were committed during the commission of the offense upon which the defendant is being sentenced. In order to find that this aggravating circumstance applies, you must find that the other murder or murders was committed during a continuous course of criminal conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`Hearsay' is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.