State v. Casey’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
52 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2021 · most notably Fragoso v. Fell (2005), McKaney v. Foreman (2004)
52 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Patterson v. New York · Martin v. Ohio · Pool v. Superior Court · State v. Schantz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Normally we interpret clauses in the Arizona Constitution in conformity with decisions of the United States Supreme Court and its interpretation of similar clauses in the United States Constitution. However, interpretation of the state constitution is, of course, our province.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Doe v. State“[T]he burden of proof is on the opponent of the statute to show it infringes upon a constitutional guarantee or violates a constitutional principle.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Reed“those interpretations have great weight in accomplishing the desired uniformity between the clauses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McKaney v. Foreman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.