Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

205 Ariz. 458

72 P.3d 1277

State v. Darelli

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 31, 2003

Court of Appeals of Arizona · decided 2003-07-31

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-07-31

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2025

15 state decisions

120200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

GARBARINO, Judge,

¶1concurring in part, dissenting in part.

¶2¶ 28 I respectfully dissent. In contrast to Donald, there was never a plea agreement on the table in this case. At most, there was the suggestion by the prosecuting attorney that she would seek the approval of her supervisor to offer a plea agreement. It was at that point that the trial court advised the parties that it would only accept a plea of guilty or a dismissal of the charges. Had the defendant believed the court to be in error by not reviewing whatever plea the parties may have submitted, he should have petitioned for special action relief. Although I agree with the majority that the trial court erred, I do not believe that we should now set aside a valid conviction so that the parties can, if they are willing to do so, enter into plea negotiations. I would affirm the conviction.

/205/ariz/458 · .json · Public domain