Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 Ark. 1063 - Stewart v. Hedrick

Stewart v. Hedrick’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 2014

12 state decisions

6019431950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wilson v. Davis · Holloway v. Parker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ " * * The law applicable to the case was stated in the opinion in Wilson v. Davis, 138 Ark. Ill, 211 S.W. 152 , where it was said that a conspiracy may be inferred although no actual meeting of the parties is proved, if it be shown that two or more persons pursued by their acts the same unlawful purpose, each doing a part, so that their acts, though apparently independent, were in fact connected; and that when such an unlawful agreement is entered into, tne parties become liable as joint tortfeasors to the extent of the damage done as a result of the conspiracy, and the liability of a particular conspirator does not depend upon the extent to which he profited nor his activity in promoting the conspiracy.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.