In Re Daniel’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2016
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 350 · 11 U.S.C. § 541
Relies on 212 Ga. App. 454 - Southmark Corp. v. Trotter, Smith & Jacobs · 223 Ga. App. 650 - Johnson v. Trust Co. Bank · Neville v. Harris · In Re Blossom · Lampl v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Debtor now seeks to cure her earlier omission and, most significantly, intends to share the fruits of any recovery with her prepetition creditors. Any advantage which Debtor may have gained by omitting the asset from her schedules is eliminated by reopening, amending the schedules and allowing the Chapter 7 Trustee to administer the asset.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Barger“[r]eopening may be detrimental to [the defendant] by depriving it of a judicial estoppel argument but this court cannot countenance depriving Debtor's creditors of the opportunity to share in damages to which Debtor is entitled in order to preserve [the defendant's] judicial estoppel argument”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.