In Re Ladak’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Audubon v. Shufeldt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We caution against reading our holding as a case where the discharge of debts in bankruptcy may prohibit a state court from modifying a divorce decree concerning spousal maintenance or child support because of a material change in circumstances. There is no ongoing maintenance obligation flowing from Debtor to Respondent to modify here.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Fluke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.