Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

205 Cal. 674

272 P 288

Cammack v. Cammack

California Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1928

California Supreme Court · decided 1928-11-27

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1932

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1928-11-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1This is an appeal by the defendant from an order denying his application to have the care, custody, and control of Frank Strawn, aged ten, and Mary Jane, aged eight, the minor children of the parties, transferred from the plaintiff, their mother, to the defendant. [1] The appeal is based upon the contention of the defendant that the evidence is insufficient to support the conclusion of the trial court that the mother is a fit and proper person to have the custody of her children. *675

¶2The order was discretionary and may not be set aside except for an abuse of discretion. A review of the record discloses that the evidence was sufficient to support the order and that the trial court was properly guided by the considerations prescribed by section 246 of the Civil Code. No abuse of discretion is shown.

¶3The judgment is affirmed.

¶4Richards, J., and Langdon, J., concurred.

/205/cal/674 · .json · Public domain