Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

205 Cal. App. 673

Beazell v. Schrader

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 1962

California Court of Appeal · decided 1962-07-16

Relies on 103 Cal. App. 2d 185 - Schmidt v. Townsend · 149 Cal. App. 2d 296 - Futlick v. F. W. Woolworth Co. · Tellefsen v. Key System Transit Lines

Decided 1962-07-16

BURKE, P. J.

¶1Plaintiff purports to appeal from an order sustaining without leave to amend defendant’s demurrer to a first amended complaint.

¶2On November 3, 1961, a minute order was entered sustaining defendant’s demurrer to first amended complaint without leave to amend for failure to state a cause of action within the jurisdiction of the superior court. No judgment thereon has been entered.

¶3*674[ 1 ] It is well settled that an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend is not an appealable order or a final judgment. A reviewing court does not have jurisdiction to review an appeal of this type. (Tellefsen v. Key System Transit Lines, 187 Cal.App.2d 44 [9 Cal.Rptr. 299]; Futlick v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 149 Cal.App.2d 296, 298 [308 P.2d 405]; Schmidt v. Townsend, 103 Cal.App.2d 185, 186-187 [229 P.2d 488]; see also 3 Witkin, Cal. Procedure, § 19, p. 2162.)

¶4The purported appeal is dismissed.

¶5J efferson, J., and Balthis, J., concurred.

/205/calapp/673 · .json · Public domain