Tsarnas v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2012
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gore v. Bingaman · 179 Cal. App. 2d 332 - Tsarnas v. Bailey · 122 Cal. App. 2d 503 - Peebler v. Seawell · 196 Cal. App. 2d 564 - Western Electro-Plating Co. v. Henness · 180 Cal. App. 2d 368 - Stafford v. Municipal Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where a reviewing court reverses a judgment with directions ... the trial court is bound by the directions given and has no authority to retry any other issue or to make any other findings. Its authority is limited wholly and solely to following the directions of the reviewing court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The courts have repeatedly adhered strictly to the rule.... Any proceedings had or judgment rendered contrary to such specific directions would be void”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.