205 Cal. App. 2d 621 - Jordan v. Warnke’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 1984 · most notably Mercer v. Perez (1968), Treber v. Superior Court (1968)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Berniker v. Berniker · Overton v. Vita-Food Corp. · Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co. · Bradley Co. v. Bradley · Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Minnette
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defendant apparently agrees with this conclusion since in his opening brief it is stated: “With reference to the Plaintiff’s appeal from the Court’s amendment of his findings of fact and conclusions of law, we have spent a number of hours on this matter and cannot find any defense from that appeal. "Therefore, if the amended findings of fact and conclusions of law and judgment fail by reason of the failure of the Defendant’s attorney to file his motion for a new trial on time and also the trial Court’s failure to make its ruling on time, it would follow that the findings of fact and conclusions of law originally made by the judge will have to stand."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.