State v. Amore’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 3101 · 42 U.S.C. § 407 (§ 207 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Rideout v. United States · Ratchford v. Gay Lib · Philpott v. Essex County Welfare Board · 28 Cal. 3d 807 - Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc. · Baldwin v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Itlhe right of any person to any future payment under this subchapter shall not be transferable or assignable, at law or in equity, and none of the moneys paid or payable or rights existing under this sub-chapter shall be subject to execution, levy, attachment, garnishment, or other legal pro cess, or to the operation of any bankruptey or insolvency law,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“42 U.S.C. § 407 , by virtue of the Supremacy Clause . . . [does not] preclude the State of Connecticut from attaching the individually owned assets of the defendant representative payee to recover the costs of the confined beneficiary's care and treatment at a state humane institution. .[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.