Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 CONN 386 - State v. Hufford

State v. Hufford’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

153
cited by 153 later decisions
3
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 147 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 153 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably State v. Brown (1995), State v. John (1989)

2 federal appellate · 147 state decisions

66019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Davis v. Alaska · Pointer v. Texas · Michigan v. Long

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 153 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““General Statutes § 53a-65 (7) (B) defines ‘use of force’ as ‘use of actual physical force or violence of superior physical strength against the victim.’ ” State v. Hufford, 205 Conn. 386, 391 , 533 A.2d 866 (1987).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] verdict rendered on a single count charging alternative methods of committing the same crime may be upheld only if there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict as to each alternative charged,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[A]n information which charges two or more separate offenses in the alternative is fatally defective because of its failure adequately to apprise the defendant of the specific charge against him”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.