Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 CONN 638 - State v. Jones

State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

134
cited by 134 later decisions
2
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

134 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 134 later decisions — most recently March 2010 · most notably 29 Conn. App. 112 - In re Michael M. (1992), 33 Conn. App. 12 - In re Kezia M. (1993)

134 state decisions

7001987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Edwards v. Arizona · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 134 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The inquiry whether the defendant has made a knowing, voluntary and intelligent waiver of his fifth amendment right has two distinct dimensions. . . . First, the relinquishment of the right must have been voluntary in the sense that it was the product of a free and deliberate choice rather than intimidation, coercion, or deception. Second, the waiver must have been made with a full awareness both of the nature of the right being abandoned and the consequences of the decision to abandon it. Only if the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he testimony suggested that Simms and Mohagel were the main perpetrators of crimes in the cathedral area and that perhaps the [petitioner] was not involved in any of those crimes,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “reasonable presumption against the waiver of fundamental constitutional rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.