State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
136 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 136 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably State v. Pinnock (1992), State v. Tatum (1991)
136 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Rakas v. Illinois · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Pemberton · State v. Evans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 136 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A. No, I didn’t. No, I didn’t. “Q. Never once? “A. No, not talk about the case to her. But I spoke— “Q. Go ahead. . “A. — I spoke to her the morning that I seen her— the same morning they dropped the car off, I seen Glenda on Garden Street, on the corner of Garden and Edgewood. They were looking for this — what the boy name? The one that got killed. They were looking for him to tell him that Boo and them were looking for him to kill him. ” 10 (Emphasis added.) If the testimony was offered to corroborate Hightower’s earlier testimony, the testimony was necessarily cumulative of her narration of the conversation between Herring and the defendant in which they had discussed their plans for Liftman’s future. Accordingly, we conclude that the defendant has not shown that it is more probable than not that the erroneously admitted testimony affected the result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robinson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.