Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 F.1d 563 - In re Podolin

In re Podolin’s Empirical Analysis

205 F. 563 · 1913

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
September 1921
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on In re Harris · William Ensign v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania No 123 Charles a Ensign · In re Hark · In re Edward Hess & Co. · In re Bendheim

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The referee's order * * * will be so modified, ex majori cautela. as to provide expressly that the bankrupts may omit from their schedules any reference to the transaction with Kudsky. They are still exposed to the danger of prosecution in connection with that transaction, and they should not be compelled to run the not remote risk of having their statements used against them in such a prosecution. The connection between such statements and the evidence required to sustain the prosecution is direct and immediate.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.