In re Hodge’s Empirical Analysis
205 F. 824 · 1913
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 1984
2 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on E. H. Godshalk Co. v. Sterling · In re Simon & Sternberg · Wheeler v. Siegel, Cooper & Co. · In re Knaszak · In re Marcus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““the referee’s findings upon conflicting evidence or when different inferences may be drawn from a conceded state of facts, are entitled to tire same consideration as those of a District Judge.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Stafford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.