205 F.2d 151
Docket No. 254.
Docket Docket 22671.
Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1953-06-22
2 counsel of record
Relies on 106 F. Supp. 461 - Fontana v. Pennsylvania R. Co.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1953-06-22
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently March 1993 · most notably Haynes v. Rederi A/S Aladdin (1966), Shellman v. United States Lines, Inc. (1975)
21 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Edward Weinfeld, Judge.
Nathan Baker, New York City, Bernard Chazen, Hoboken, N. J., on the brief, for libellant-appellant.
Kirlin Campbell & Keating, New York City, Thomas Coyne and Vernon Sims Jones, New York City, of counsel, for intervenor-appellee.
Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed on opinion below, 106 F.Supp. 461.