Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 F.2d 321 - Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Meyer

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Meyer’s Empirical Analysis

205 F.2d 321 · 1953

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
March 2007
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2007

3 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

40195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 12 Cal. 2d 598 - Hamilton v. Pacific Electric Railway Co. · Louie v. Hagstrom's Food Stores, Inc. · 39 Cal. 2d 153 - Sexton v. Brooks · Granucci v. Claasen · 91 Cal. App. 2d 664 - Travis v. Metropolitan Theatres Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “had dirt on it” when she slipped upon it, thus indicating that it had been there for some time. Furthermore, defendant”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.