Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 F.2d 560 - Takehara v. Dulles

Takehara v. Dulles’s Empirical Analysis

205 F.2d 560 · 1953

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
May 2001
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2001

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

130195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1481 (§ 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 801

Relies on United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. · Helvering v. National Grocery Co. · Quock Ting v. United States · Reagan v. United States · Dyer v. MacDougall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * if! S}C “(5) voting in a political election in a foreign state or participating in an election or plebiscite to determine the sovereignty over foreign territory; * * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.