Zank v. Landon’s Empirical Analysis
205 F.2d 615 · 1953
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 2007
13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Heikkila v. Barber · Patterson v. Alabama
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * *, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(h), 28 U.S.C.A., applies. The pertinent portion of that rule is ‘ * * * whenever it appears by suggestion of the parties or otherwise that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter, the court shall dismiss the action. * * * ’ ” Zank v. Landon, 9 Cir., 205 F.2d 615 at page 616.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stanard v. Olesen“a deportation may be attacked only in a habeas corpus proceeding”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ramadan v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.