Rosenthal v. Stein’s Empirical Analysis
205 F.2d 633 · 1953
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1989
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 171
Relies on Gorham Company v. White · Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co. · Gay v. Parpart · Baker v. Selden · United States v. Backer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A thing is a work of art if it appears to be within the historical and ordinary conception of the term “art”. (Rosenthal v. Stein, 205 F.2d 633, 635 (9th Cir.1953)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Leonardo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.