In Re Sokolowski’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably Price v. US, In Re Caraballo (2008)
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Ellis v. Washington County · United States v. Ianniello · Johnson v. Righetti · Collingwood Grain, Inc. v. Coast Trading Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Sokolowski ha[d] failed to proffer competent evidence to support her claim that this particular appeal ha[d] been rendered moot. Specifically, she ha[d] not pointed to any evidence in the record of her satisfaction of the BankBoston loan or of her disposal of the vehicle in question.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“unless and until its rationale is overruled, implicitly or expressly, by the Supreme Court, or this court in banc.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.