Mishkin v. Gurian’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation & Finance · Boguslavsky v. Kaplan · Bush v. Balfour Beatty Bahamas, Ltd. · Abrams v. Interco Inc. · Wolstein v. Docteroff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he general rule is well-established that default judgments lack issue-preclusive effect.” In re Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp. v. Gurian, 205 Fed.Appx. 856, 857 , 2006 WL 2374238 , at (2d Cir.2006) (citing Abrams v. Interco Inc., 719 F.2d 23 , 34 n. 9 (2d Cir. 1983), Amato v. City of Saratoga Springs, N.Y., 170 F.3d 311, 323 (2d Cir.1999) (Jacobs, J. concurring), Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 27 cmt. e (1982)); see also Corpus Juris Secundum, Judgments § 797 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.