Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 FRD 497 - Yates v. Applied Performance Technologies, Inc.

Yates v. Applied Performance Technologies, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2023

4 state decisions

30200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 29 U.S.C. § 255

Relies on Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc. · United Nuclear Corporation v. Cranford Insurance Company · Ambalu v. Rosenblatt · 66 F. Supp. 2d 638 - Jordan v. City of Philadelphia · Tucker v. Ohtsu Tire & Rubber Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.