Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 FRD 596 - Cooper v. Southern Co.

Cooper v. Southern Co.’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
December 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States · Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “inadequate showing ... to raise a presumption of discrimination arising from application of the collective whole of Defendants' compensation and promotion policies. Thus, disparate impact analysis produce[d] no evidence common to the claims of all class members. Also, the [statistical evidence] fail[ed] to establish evidence of a pattern and practice of discrimination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the commonality and typicality requirements of Rule 23(a) overlap. Both requirements focus on whether a sufficient nexus exists between the legal claims of the named class representatives and those of individual class members to warrant class certification.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the common bond between the class representatives' claims and those of the class is strong enough so that it is fair for the fortunes of the class members to rise or fall with the fortunes of the class representatives.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.