In Re Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 1993 · most notably 407 F. Supp. 799 - McMillin v. First National Bank & Trust Co. (1975), Plemens v. Diddeglaser, Inc. (1966)
10 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Luckenbill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * Whether a prior order should be re-examined, and, if re-examined, whether it should be vacated or modified is normally a matter of sound discretion with the referee or district judge as the ease may be * * *. 205 F.Supp. at 29 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Ostrer“(1) Presentation for filing of a financing statement and tender of the filing fee or acceptance of the statement by the filing officer constitutes filing under this article.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.