In Re Sharp’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 706 · 11 U.S.C. § 707
Relies on Thompson v. Terminal Shares, Inc. · 51 F. Supp. 12 - In Re Thompson · Fishman v. Verlin · Blaffer v. Commissioner · 148 F. Supp. 660 - In Re Verlin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We * * * sustain the petition for review for the reason that the portion of Section 14, sub. c(5) of the Bankruptcy Act relating to a prior discharge is inconsistent and in conflict with the applicable provisions of Chapter XIII; and, under Section 602, not applicable to those provisions of Chapter XIII which authorize the approval of an extension plan for the debtor.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Belkin““The provisions of chapters 1 to 7, inclusive, of this title shall, insofar as they are not inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this chapter, apply in proceedings under this chapter.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Belkin“The debtor seeks to pay debts — not to discharge them. In that effort he should be encouraged. Such encouragement is in accord with the declared Congressional intent of Chapter XIII.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Holmes Xiii
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.