Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 Ga. App. 679 - Fulmer v. State

205 Ga. App. 679 - Fulmer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2007
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Mulkey · Law v. State · 196 Ga. App. 794 - Gurlaskie v. State · 196 Ga. App. 25 - Hicks v. State · 193 Ga. App. 61 - Askew v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where a witness voluntarily injects into the trial improper and prejudicial matters, whether a mistrial must be granted or whether the effect can be corrected by instructions to the jury is a matter within the discretion of the trial court. The trial court’s ruling will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion, which does not exist if the curative instructions given can serve to prevent the alleged harmful testimony from having any prejudicial impact. 52”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.