Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 Ga. App. 754 - Hyde v. State

205 Ga. App. 754 - Hyde v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Harrell v. State · Maggard v. State · Smith v. State · 159 Ga. App. 642 - Hester v. State · 198 Ga. App. 575 - McGowan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant made only a general request for limiting instructions, which the trial court obviously did not construe as a specific request for contemporaneous limiting instructions. When the trial court indicated that it would, in fact, give such instructions in its subsequent general charge, appellant did nothing to indicate that the timing, as well as the giving, of such instructions was a material consideration. Accordingly, for all intents and purposes, the trial court complied with the only request that was ever made by appellant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.