Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 ILL 511 - Borggard v. Gale

Borggard v. Gale’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
October 1948
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 1948

13 state decisions

5019031910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedBorggard v. Gale

Relationships

Relies on Cowen v. Sunderland · Sunasack v. Morey · Anderson v. Hayes · Coke v. Gutkese · Kern v. Myll

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The general rule is, that a landlord is not bound to make repairs unless he has assumed such duty by express agreement with the tenant. An exception to the rule, however, exists where there are defects in the demised premises, attended with danger to an occupant, which a carful examination would not disclose, which are known to exist by the landlord and are not known to the tenant. In such case a duty rests upon the landlord to notify the tenant of such defects. (Sunasack v. Morey, 196 Ill. 569 .) The duty resting upon the landlord to notify the tenant of a defect in the premises which a careful examination would not disclose, but of which the landlord has notice while the tenant has not, we think may well be placed upon, the ground, in many cases, that a failure to make such disclosure would be a fraud upon the tenant; for instance, if the premises were infected with a contagious disease, as was the case in Snyder v. Gordon, 46 Hun, 538 , or impregnated with sewer gas, the presence of which was denied by the landlord, as in Sunasack v. Morey, supra.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.