205 Ill. App. 3d 597 - People v. Bolar’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 1997
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rakas v. Illinois · 186 Ill. App. 3d 1007 - People v. Manikowski · 133 Ill. App. 3d 1061 - People v. Carlton · 143 Ill. App. 3d 1083 - People v. Ingram
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The uncontroverted evidence established that Wallace, the driver and owner of the vehicle, consented to a search of the car and its contents. The sack was open and standing in plain view. Moreover, the defendant did not assert a possessory interest in the sack or its contents. Consequently, we find that he did not have a legitimate expectation of privacy in the sack and thus lacked standing to challenge the search.” Bolar, 205 Ill. App. 3d at 599 , 563 N.E.2d at 1227 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Bolar · People v. James
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.