State v. Redmon’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently December 2003 · most notably State Ex Rel. Agan v. HENDRICKS SUP. CT., GIBBS, JUDGE (1968), McGill v. MUDDY FORK OF SILVER CREEK, ETC. (1977)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Storms v. Stevens · Bartlett v. Manor · Ryan v. Ray · Swinney v. Ft. Wayne, Muncie & Cincinnati R. R. · Fisher v. Tuller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"... the filing by [appellant] of exceptions to the appraisers' report after the expiration of ten days after such report was filed was a nullity, that the jurisdiction of the trial court to try the issue of damages rested entirely upon the exceptions of [appellee]; and that when the trial court sustained [appellee's] motion to dismiss its exceptions the trial court had no power to proceed further in the trial." Id. at p. 340, 186 N.E. p. 329.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"A trial court may in its discretion extend time for filing pleadings when the fixing of the time is within the discretion of the court. But a trial court can not extend the time when the time is fixed by statute. This is especially true when the time limited constitutes an element of a right or privilege which is being asserted in a pleading in a special statutory proceeding."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[The filing of exceptions by either party brings before the court the whole question of allowable damages; and, consequently, the issues would not be enlarged by a filing of exceptions by the second party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.