Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 Kan. 514 - Sade v. Hemstrom

Sade v. Hemstrom’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
5
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 4 district · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently November 2013 · most notably Mays v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. (1983), York v. InTrust Bank, N.A. (1998)

8 federal appellate · 4 district · 31 state decisions

24019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fenly v. Revell · Collins v. Meeker · Jacobson v. Parrill · Hoover Equipment Co. v. Smith · Schneider v. Washington National Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whether an instrument entitled 'Compromise and Settlement Agreement’ is to be construed as a release or a covenant not to sue is determined by the terms of the instrument, the words used, the amount shown as paid and accepted, the substance of the agreement and the intention of the parties as manifested by the instrument.” (Syl. f 5.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A party cannot escape summary judgment on the mere hope that something may develop at the trial, or by remaining silent and later claiming additional facts supporting a defense or a cause of action.” (Syl. ¶ 1.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.