Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 Kan. 867 - Cox v. State

Cox v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
April 1997
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 1997 · most notably State v. Nunn (1989), State v. Gunzelman (1972)

28 state decisions

140197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Benton v. Maryland · Green v. United States · Palko v. State of Connecticut · Wade v. Hunter · Smith v. O'Grady

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . A defendant is in jeopardy when he is put on trial in a court of competent jurisdiction upon an indictment, information or complaint sufficient in form and substance to sustain a conviction, and in the case of trial by jury, when the jury has been impaneled and sworn, or where the case is tried to the court without a jury, when the court has begun to hear evidence.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““No amendment of an information is necessary in order that the prosecuting attorney may abandon a greater charge and proceed against an accused on a lesser one included therein and a simple motion made verbally in open court, or an announcement of such intention is sufficient if made before the trial begins.” Syl. f 7.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.