Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 La. 387 - State v. Dreaux

State v. Dreaux’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
4
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably 414 So. 2d 666 - State v. Wimberly (1982), State v. George (1950)

32 state decisions

10019441950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Guidry · State v. Hardy · State v. Ugarte · Davis v. O'Grady · Goodman v. Kunkle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “by delaying the filing of the charges and prosecution of the case, to fix the accused's status as a second offender at practically any time he desired.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “and not the uncertain date left largely in the discretion of the district attorney ... when he will be charged, tried, and sentenced for the commission of the crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The heavier or enhanced punishment being for the new crime only is necessarily incurred at the time the defendant committed the second felony, although the legal proceedings under which his guilt was formally established were had subsequently. Briefly, his own acts and conduct which constitute a violation of the criminal law make him a second offender as of that date.... The sentence of the court shows that he was punished for the crime he committed. The proceeding under either of the Habitual Criminal Statutes in question is merely the legal procedure through which the State must establish that the defendant is a second offender. Necessarily, the State must prove that the accused had been previously convicted twice of a felony before he can be punished as a second offender.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.