Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 Md. 362 - Polansky v. State

Polansky v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
3
states following
September 2001
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently September 2001 · most notably West v. State (1988), Cross v. State (1978)

42 state decisions

2202001decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Luery v. State · Duren v. State · Lanasa v. State · Campbell v. Campbell · Cooper v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Manual possession is not necessary to constitute receiving. However, one is guilty of so receiving as soon as one obtains a measure of control or dominion over the custody of the goods. And such receiving may be by an agent or through the instrumentality of another____’” 219 Md. at 44 , 148 A.2d 292 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.