205 Md. App. 413 - Hastings v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ross v. State · Nails v. S & R, INC. · Smith v. State · Jones v. State · Hoffert v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Did the Court of Special Appeals improperly deny your Petitioner damages, that is a monetary award, only because the portion of the jury’s verdict that awarded damages had not been announced in open court? 2. Did the Circuit Court have the power to correct what it saw as an inconsistent verdict?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Turner v. Hastings“__YES _NO IF YOU HAVE ANSWERED “YES” TO QUESTION NO. 2, PLEASE TERMINATE YOUR DELIBERATIONS AND NOTIFY THE BAILIFF. IF YOU HAVE ANSWERED “YES” TO QUESTION NO. 1 AND IF YOU HAVE ANSWERED “NO” TO QUESTION NO. 2, PLEASE ANSWER QUESTION NO. 3.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Turner v. Hastings“a. Medical expenses incurred in the past: $325.00 b. Loss of income reasonably probable to have been incurred in the past: $18,000 c. Non-economie damages including pain and suffering: $0 d. Property damage to the taxi cab: $2,820”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Turner v. Hastings
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.