Crampton v. Crampton’s Empirical Analysis
1919
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1952
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Woodin v. Durfee · Yonkus v. McKay · Neumann v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co. · Montague v. Dougan · Edwards v. Nelson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The first question argued by appellant is that the court erred in permitting the interpleaded defendant to be interrogated upon the subject of fraud- or bad faith in his transactions with the principal defendant, claiming that it was an affirmative defense and that notice should have -been given thereof, under Circuit Court Rule No. 23. We cannot agree with appellant’s counsel in this claim. Not only by stipulation, but under correct practice, the interpleaded defendant had the affirmative of the issue, and the rule referred to is wholly inapplicable in such a proceeding.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Creedon v. Lundy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.