Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

205 Misc. 42

Dudic Holding Corp. v. Feinstein

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1953-12-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1961

1 state decisions

Relies on Goldstein v. Alweiss · Kaplan v. Sessler · Taft Construction Corp. v. Bachnoff

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1953-12-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The installation and maintenance by the tenant of an air conditioning unit projecting beyond the building wall is an intrusion or squatting upon the landlord’s property within *43the purview of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act (Joan Bldg. Corp. v. Gould, 276 App. Div. 765; Tuchfeld v. Annenberg, N. Y. L. J. May 18, 1951, p. 1849, col. 5; Thatford Stone Corp. v. Sassano, N. Y. L. J., June 27, 1952, p. 2521, col. 2; Goldstein v. Alweiss, 196 Misc. 513; Prestipino v. Matarazzo, 99 N. Y. S. 2d 606; Kaplan v. Sessler, 197 Misc. 270). Insofar as Taft Constr. Corp. v. Bachnoff (107 N. Y. S. 2d 898, affd. 116 N. Y. S. 2d 67) is to the contrary, we must decline to follow it.

¶2The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs to the landlord and final order directed for the landlord as prayed for in the petition.

¶3Walsh, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

¶4Final order reversed, etc.

/205/misc/42 · .json · Public domain