Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 N.C. App. 247 - State v. McLean

205 N.C. App. 247 - State v. McLean’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Odom · Morgan Walton Properties, Inc. v. International City Bank & Trust Co. · Vinson v. Kelly · Ohio v. Fleet Aerospace Corp. · United States v. McCaskill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When reviewing jury instructions, they will be construed contextually, and isolated portions will not be held prejudicial when the charge as a whole is correct. If the charge presents the law fairly and clearly to the jury, the fact that some expressions, standing alone, might be considered erroneous will afford no ground for reversal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.