Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 N.C. App. 629 - State v. Moses

205 N.C. App. 629 - State v. Moses’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · State v. Cooke · State v. Barden · State v. Perry · State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Legislature ... did not intend to subject a defendant to multiple punishments for both robbery and the possession of stolen goods that were the proceeds of the same robbery”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[H]aving determined that the crimes of larceny, receiving, and possession of stolen property are separate and distinct offenses, but having concluded that the Legislature did not intend to punish an individual for receiving or possession of the same goods that he stole, we hold that, though a defendant may be indicted and tried on charges of larceny, receiving, and possession of the same property, he may be convicted of only one of those offenses.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he sentence imposed was unauthorized at the time imposed, exceeded the maximum authorized by law, was illegally imposed, or is otherwise invalid as a matter of law,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.