Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 N.C. App. 707 - State v. Stanley

205 N.C. App. 707 - State v. Stanley’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Renfro · 203 N.C. App. 627 - State v. McCravey · 174 N.C. App. 118 - Trayford v. North Carolina Psychology Board · 159 N.C. App. 220 - Downs v. State · Keyzer v. Amerlink, Ltd.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Statutory interpretation begins with the cardinal principle of statutory construction that the intent of the legislature is controlling. In ascertaining the legislative intent, courts should consider the language of the statute, the spirit of the statute, and what it seeks to accomplish. Where the statutory language is clear and unambiguous, the Court does not engage in judicial construction but must apply the statute to give effect to the plain and definite meaning of the language.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.