Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 N.C. App. 717 - McCraw v. Aux

205 N.C. App. 717 - McCraw v. Aux’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Booker v. Everhart · White v. Pate · 50 N.C. App. 432 - Begley v. Employment Security Commission · 193 N.C. App. 644 - Kor Xiong v. Marks · 40 N.C. App. 188 - Ludwig v. Hart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a necessary party was not properly joined we refuse to deal with the merits of the action until the necessary party is brought into the action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “one whose interest will be directly affected by the outcome of the litigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.