State v. Shelley’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
4 district · 73 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 860 (§ 419 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Burnett v. County of Bergen · State v. Maldonado · ABBOTT BY ABBOTT v. Burke · State v. Ivory · State v. Soto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]o manufacture, distribute, or dispense, or to possess . . . with intent to manufacture, distribute or dispense, a controlled dangerous substance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“to divine and effectuate the Legislature's intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“a counterfeit controlled dangerous substance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.