Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 N.J. 40 - State v. Acevedo

State v. Acevedo’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bibby v. United States · Kelly v. Robinson · State v. Yarbough · State v. Jarbath · State v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A sentence is illegal if it 'exceeds the maximum penalty provided in the Code for a particular offense,' is 'not imposed in accordance with law,' or fails to include a mandatory sentencing requirement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'mere excessiveness of sentence otherwise within authorized limits, as distinct from illegality by reason of being beyond or not in * accordance with legal authorization,' does not render a sentence illegal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A] truly 'illegal' sentence can be corrected 'at any time.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.