Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 NW2D 698 - State v. Carncross

State v. Carncross’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 1976
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Cupples · State v. Cole · State v. Beer · State v. Patterson · State v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is our duty to carefully consider whether the punishment is too severe. Where the judgment does not exceed the statutory maximum, it is only where an abuse of the trial court’s discretion is shown that we will interfere. The de termination of whether to sentence a defendant to jail and assess a fine rather than to the penitentiary, as permitted under section 708.8, is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court as is the question of any probation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is our duty to carefully consider whether the punishment is too severe. Code section 793.18. We have, however, consistently held that where the judgment does not exceed the statutory maximum, we will interfere only where an abuse of the trial court's discretion is shown. * * * [citing authorities].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.