Marshall v. Cantrell’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2010
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gilliland v. Bilby · Harsha v. Richardson · Cantrell v. Marshall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The decision on the appeal was a complete determination of the issues involved in the case and judgment thereon as directed a final determination of the rights involved .... the trial court was in duty bound to execute the mandate of this court by entering judgment for defendant in accordance with the law of the case as stated in the opinion, which was done, and the court was without authority to entertain the amended petition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Where a cause' is reversed and remanded by the Supreme Court with directions to proceed in accordance with the decision of the appellate court, and the court below proceeds in substantial conformity with such direction, its action will not be considered on a second appeal.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Marshall v. Marshall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.