Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 P3D 410 - Luster v. Brinkman

Luster v. Brinkman’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2025

4 state decisions

20200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kogan v. People · People v. Shreck · Masters v. People · 935 So. 2d 646 - Salvant v. State · People v. Schwartz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plaintiffs' arguments are premised on theories of causation which have rejected the body of literature finding that intrauterine forces can cause brachial plexus injuries. Where, as here, competing evidentiary theories exist, it is the fact finder's function to consider what weight should be given to all parts of the evidence. This includes the resolving of conflicts, inconsistencies, and disputes in the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.