Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 So. 2d 267 - Tippit v. Hunter

205 So. 2d 267 - Tippit v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably 632 So. 2d 936 - Brent v. State (1994), 792 So. 2d 240 - Powell v. Ayars (2001)

1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

70196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rayner v. Lindsey · City of Hattiesburg v. Hillman · Kettle v. Musser's Potato Chips, Inc. · Jackson Yellow Cab Co. v. Alexander · Whatley v. Delta Brokerage & Warehouse Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * The driver of an automobile is chargeable with knowledge of all conditions which would be obtainable by the reasonable exercise of his faculties. It is his duty to see that which is in plain view or open and apparent and to take notice of obvious dangers. He must be regarded as having seen what he would have necessarily seen had he been looking, and if an automobile driver fails to reasonably observe that which was apparent and within clear view, the jury can reasonably determine from the circumstances that he was not keeping a proper lookout.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]n order to obtain a review of the question of propriety of remarks or conduct of the trial judge during a trial, the remarks must be especially called to the attention of the trial judge when made, and a correction requested or a proper objection made at the time.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “wholly immaterial evidence may not be elicited from the witness on cross-examination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.